From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7637cfdf68e766 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,c7637cfdf68e766 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,c7637cfdf68e766 X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public X-Google-Thread: 107079,c7637cfdf68e766 X-Google-Attributes: gid107079,public X-Google-Thread: f8362,c7637cfdf68e766 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8362,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: floating point comparison Date: 1997/08/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 262726963 References: <33DF6F43.6EEA4806@digicomp.com> <5rqehs$g1r$1@odin.cc.pdx.edu> <33E11967.4A30@nr.net> <33E214C3.311C@pseserv3.fw.hac.com> <33E61497.33E2@pseserv3.fw.hac.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,sci.math.num-analysis,comp.software-eng,comp.theory,sci.math Date: 1997-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Wes says <> But how would you know it was working as expected? If you have not done the numerical analysis required to ensure that the accuracy of the results meets the specification, you are basically in the hack-away-and-don't-worry-about-whether-it-works-if-it-looks-more- or-less-reasonable-it-must-be-right mode. Sure people write code in this mode all the time, and some of it works by accident. But the cases in which people taking this kind of attitude to floating-point have created catastrophes are many!