From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,af27044bbd8d36a1
X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,86616b1931cbdae5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Is Ada likely to survive ?
Date: 1997/08/02
Message-ID: <dewar.870524681@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 261685361
References: <33D005F2.E5DCD710@kaiwan.com>
 <5qp3cf$aqc$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
 <01bc977a$adaf91a0$8cb45ec3@newart.artel.it>
 <5rrtlt$i99$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pl1
Date: 1997-08-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


robin says

<<You'll find those attributes in PL/I, which has traditionally
been used for building large systems.  Probably the most
widely-known of these projects is the Multics system.>>


Surely you can do better than that for an examle. TO contest people's
(erroneous) view that a language is dead, it is not helpful to point
to a system that was itself pretty much a failure, and which is most
certainly itself dead now.