From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6a027e3683bf9fa5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada 95 X binding with Apex
Date: 1997/07/30
Message-ID: <dewar.870305353@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 260764899
References: <jcreem-3007971315010001@ljd155.sanders.lockheed.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


jeff says, somewhat mysteriously:

<<Has anyone gotten the intermetrics Ada 95 X bindings to work with Rational
apex 2.2.3A . I've got it working with GNAT but Apex does not like
pragma convention due to RM_95 B.2(21)
>>

I guess I have a (pseudo-leather bound) truncated version of the RM, my
section B.2 only has 13 paragraphs.

I can't even guess what para is being referenced here?