From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca4868d2201d6f5b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: demise of ajpo?
Date: 1997/07/29
Message-ID: <dewar.870192058@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 260675975
References: <33CE894F.41C6@hso.link.com> <dewar.869953226@merv>
 <5ri2d9$kbo@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Phil said

<<Minor correction, and a little secondhand information:  The last day to START
an ACVC 2.1 validation was July 5, 1997.  Any validation effort that began
on-site testing by that date was permitted to complete.  Several validations
fell into those categories, and their certificate requests were not submitted
to the AJPO/AdaIC until later.  Since the AdaIC received NO certificate
requests during June, the decision was made to delay the July update to the
VCL until those requests were complete.  It should appear any day now.
>>

You surely mean 2.0.1 and not 2.1 in the above, right?