From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca4868d2201d6f5b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: demise of ajpo?
Date: 1997/07/26
Message-ID: <dewar.869953226@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 259187802
References: <33CE894F.41C6@hso.link.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Stanley asks

<<Is this is the reason that the validated compiler list at AdaIC,
has not yet been updated for July yet, though half the month is
gone?  I am not familiar with the connections between AdaIC and
AJPO, so I'm probably just grasping at straws here.  All I know
is that normally, the new monthly validated compiler list usually
shows up within the first three or four days of the month at:

http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/compilers/95val/95vcl.htm

But not now, July, the same month when the article above appeared.
>>

We assume that the delay is just because there were a lot of validations
at the last minute (June 30 was the last day for ACVC 2.0.1 validations,
and we know of a lot of validations in those last cople weeks).