From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,89226195d95fba21 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Operating Systems Date: 1997/07/23 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 258585917 References: <33D541EF.17B6@digiscape.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert asks <> I am unable to discern any Ada content here, but let's just assume that it the "programming a lot" will be in Ada, or why would the question have been posted here? If so, then an attractive alternative to NT for program development on a PC is Linux. It is less expensive than NT, and far more capable in many respects. It is also much better suited in many people's opinion to the task of program development -- Unix was really designed for this purpose, while NT was designed primarily for other purposes. This does not mean that it is impossible to do development on NT, and indeed the judgment somewhat depends on what kind of development you plan to do. If you want to fiddle around with user interfaces, e.g. the sort of thing that is probably best done in Visual Basic in any case, then NT is certainly attractive. if you are planning on developing large scale complex programs, then Linux seems a much better bet. For example, the command line support that comes with NT is truly pathetic, it is basically just DOS (OS/2 by contrast has FAR better support in this respect). So take a look at Linux -- there is a full featured Ada 95 compiler available for this environment, which is also free software (GNAT)