From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6c9800e35ccfeee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: GNAT: Performance of String functions Date: 1997/07/20 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 257797917 References: <33CF3908.3DF62EEE@ericsson.com> <33D11806.6C59@online.no> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Tarjei said <> So, clearly Vax Pascal strings are to be compared with bounded strings, not with unbounded strings, and presumably there is no automatic finalization involved. I am not sure what your "serious" overhead message is about, makes no sense to me, but perhaps it is just not clear.