From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Eiffel anyone? - Who uses it? Date: 1997/07/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 257373273 References: <33C61545.167EB0E7@tower.com> <33CA5E3D.475B@edwardjones.com> <33CB8E75.7CB1@edwardjones.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> Well the difficulty of getting a job is of course related to the balance of supply and demand, not to total volume (if you don't believe that, try to get a job as a professor of History). It maybe the case that Pascal programmers have been in oversupply, I would not know, and it maybe that Ada programmers (who no doubt will have an easier time if they at least know how to spell the name of the language) have been in relative undersupply. Certainly the total volume of code written in Pascal greatly exceeds (both then and now) the total volume of code written in Ada. The number of poeple doing serious development in Eiffel is very small, probably two orders of magnitude less than those doing work in Pascal. As far as I can tell, Eiffel has no perceptible share of the PC development market (neither does Ada), but Pascal (i.e. Delphi) has something like a 5% share. Sure that is one tenth of visual basic, but it is 5% of a HUGE market. The share was considerably higher at the time you proclaimed that "nobody" was using Pascal, so you have a very different meaning to this word than I :-) RObert.