From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c78177ec2e61f4ac
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: fd6dd,c78177ec2e61f4ac
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd6dd,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: ada and robots
Date: 1997/07/13
Message-ID: <dewar.868844665@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 256739954
References: <338CDA96.53EA@halcyon.com> <338F5D7D.6C03@tiac.net>
 <338F9D05.5EB3@bix.com> <5mqpj3$bc5$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
 <33930245.12A1@sprintmail.com> <5mv984$7kn@news.emi.com>
 <gwinn-0306971836410001@smc19.ed.ray.com> <dewar.865941342@merv>
 <gwinn-1006971907100001@dh5055139.res.ray.com> <dewar.866044546@merv>
 <33A5D644.37A3@epix.net> <33A69E46.3230@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <33AAC183.34C0@xtra.co.nz> <mheaney-ya023680002906971441590001@news.ni.net>
 <33BC2129.64A3@gsg.eds.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.robotics.misc,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<<

A type providing sets of small integers is quite remote from "a

full-blown set abstract data type"; the confusion can be traced to the

Pascal influence. If you want to see a language with "a full-blown set

abstract data type", look a SETL, whic I understand was the original

implimentation language for GNAT.>>


This is a miscconception, GNAT was always written
in Ada (first in Ada 83, later more and more Ada 95 features were used).

The confusion is with an earilr compioler  Ada/Ed, which was a quite separate effort.