From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,21bbcb8deeeab673
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada95 Pretty-Printers/Coding styles
Date: 1997/07/09
Message-ID: <dewar.868480296@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 255839196
References: <33A54D07.4E14@aisf.com> <dewar.866484793@merv>
 		 <5o9f0s$it2@client2.news.psi.net> <5odaf6$5gp@drn.zippo.com>
 <5oe5vi$ho0$1@client3.news.psi.net> <33BBEC62.5F16@gsg.eds.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Seymour says

<<A tool that forces people to use a standard style is not nearly as

valuable as

one that makes it easy for them to do so. Your web page talks about

enforcing

style, but doesn't mention automating it. If your LSE does indeed

provide for

assiting in entry of properly indented and delimited code, that's worth

mentioning explicitly; if it doesn't, I question the value of the

product,

especially since much less expensive LSEs are capable of doing that.>>


Peronsally I hate editors that try to help me with style, but for those who
lie this, of course Ada mode in EMACS has always had this capabilty.