From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53ca16c587912bce
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Source files organisation using gnat
Date: 1997/07/08
Message-ID: <dewar.868399911@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 255599731
References: <19970630185901.OAA27670@ladder02.news.aol.com>
 <gauthier-0107971637410001@193.50.185.13> <dewar.868153463@merv>
 <5podbt$sn8$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl> <dewar.868369368@merv>
 <5pu1ve$dtq@drn.zippo.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


bassi says

<<

This does not sound much different in its idea (may be not in

implementation) than using a library-based Ada compilation system

to store such informations,  as is done for example by the VAX/VMS

Ada83 compiler, i.e. the traditional Ada compilation system,

instead of source-based Ada compilation system such as gnat.>>



If it does not sound much different, then you don't qiute understand
the suggestion. It is *totally* different. This would be 100% transparent from a user
point of view, not at ALL like a library.