From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,53ca16c587912bce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Source files organisation using gnat Date: 1997/07/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 255516321 References: <19970630185901.OAA27670@ladder02.news.aol.com> <5podbt$sn8$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Geert said << So what might be useful is to have some kind of compilation server that can keep state between compilations and re-use internal datastructures like parse trees. Of course in that case you may have to worry about memory management and for example restart the server periodically.>> Yes, of course, this is an obvious idea, and is exactly what I was talking about when I said we had some schemes to substantially speed up compiatlations. In fact we hvae had a detyailed design for doing this for over a year -- i's on the list!