From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say? Date: 1997/07/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 254900538 References: <5pb8gf$j4m@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk> <5pbd6q$8si$1@news.nyu.edu> <5ph4g5$sbs$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <5pim4l$5m3$1@news.nyu.edu> <5pmg6e$nai$1@Venus.mcs.net> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-07-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Les said <> The GPL is not a mandate, or a piece of philosophy, it is a legal contract in the form of a license, that allows people to do certain things with the code. You certainly cannot ignore this contract, and if you are dealing with the GPL, you must follow the letter of this contract exactly. No one has suggested otherwise. You certainly cannot prevent unlimited redistribution of anything you distribute that is subject to the GPL. No one has suggested that you can.