From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c83ae8c4e40baa79,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Ada front end technology Date: 1997/07/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 254811286 Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: (other newsgroups trimmed, the original thread on is ADA as good for ... is far too heavily cross-posted!) Jon said <> Jon is really confused on his history here. Intermetric's approach of generating a front end that can be sold and used for rehostings is hardly new. DDCI, Alsys, and Verdix were all in this business, as well as other vendors with considerable success. For example, Alsys sold its front end to Unisys and to HP. Many other such deals were concluded. It is nice to see Intermetrics continue this tradition, but it is not a new invention that someone "finally somewhere produced". Many of the Ada 83 technologies were designed to be portable in this sense, and the fact that they succeeded is seen in the many Ada 83 products that used third party front ends.