From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53ca16c587912bce
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Source files organisation using gnat
Date: 1997/07/04
Message-ID: <dewar.868021931@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 254534073
References: <19970630185901.OAA27670@ladder02.news.aol.com>
    <dewar.867707107@merv>    <5pf9i6$kfp$1@news.pacifier.com>
    <dewar.867990043@merv> <gauthier-0407970921050001@193.50.185.13>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Michel says

<<Thanks in advance to anybody who can explain me how I could
know immediately (as simply as a "ls *.o" command) what generic
specifications or bodies are correctly compiled, what non-generic
bodyless specifications are correctly compiled.
>>

Of course now we are not talking about Ada 83 vs Ada 95, or about library
model vs source model. This is not a language issue at all, just an issue
of what tools are available.

In fact this kind of information is certainly useful, and GNAT 3.10 has
a new tool gnatls tha is designed to provide exactly this kind of
information in a convenient form.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies