From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say?
Date: 1997/06/30
Message-ID: <dewar.867720758@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 253753366
References: <m2oh8ydzt8.fsf@devo.ridgenet.net> <dewar.867079112@merv>
 	<33B014E3.3343@no.such.com> <5oqp9s$7vj$1@news.nyu.edu>
 	<m2soy3kebq.fsf@devo.ridgenet.net> <dewar.867497844@merv>
 	<slrn5ra7oi.odk.Olivier.Galibert@iria.mines.u-nancy.fr>
 	<dewar.867554739@merv> <dewar.867557676@merv>
 <JSA.97Jun30161525@alexandria.organon.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss
Date: 1997-06-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Jon asks

<<This sounds great.  One thing I've wondered about wrt gdb for Ada: is
it reasonable to think that binaries of this could be placed out with
those of GNAT?  Or is this an unreasonable burden?
>>

This is a very reasonable suggestion! It would help a lot of peoplke to
be easily able to get binaries of gdb and the other tools. The first step
is for us to create a nicely packaged set of binaries for the tools for
our customers. Then when we complete that task, the general public will
be the eventual beneficiary :-)