From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,499ea588f6acabff
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,bd4d2fccdf730b16
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: gnat-3.10
Date: 1997/06/28
Message-ID: <dewar.867511112@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 253237922
References: <m2soz7parq.fsf_-_@devo.ridgecrest.ca.us> <dewar.864929078@merv>
 	<m2oh8ydzt8.fsf@devo.ridgenet.net> <1997Jun23.102715.1@eisner>
 <m2u3ijkf7d.fsf@devo.ridgenet.net>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.gcc,gnu.misc.discuss
Date: 1997-06-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ronald said

<<Doubtful ACT will ever give out it's client list.  I know I wouldn't
give out mine.
>>

Well certainly we won't give anyone a complete client list, since many of
our clients would not appreicate this kind of publicity. However, in cases
where we have permission from clients, we are generally happy to publicize
the fact that they are clients, and have often done so in the past.

We are otherwise highly protective of our clients interests, and respect
their wishes for not having their names revealed, as I am sure people
perfectly well understand.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies