From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e2776c05028676e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Why Ada is not the Commercial Lang of Choice
Date: 1997/06/26
Message-ID: <dewar.867340209@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 252749363
References: <33a1c14d.155787285@news.mhv.net>
 <01bc7b7e$bc0a0400$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>
 <5o84gh$1a0s@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <5orpru$3q9@netline.jpl.nasa.gov>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Van Snyder says

<<Fortran 95 is _very_different_ from Fortran 66 in the respects about which you
are probably complaining (but it's hard to tell, because you offer no
specifics).
>>

Right, and naturally the use of Fortran 95 is pretty much universal among
Fortran programmers at this stage!

:-) (for the sarcasm detection impaired :-)