From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,9e5c2b01bf17dabb
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c78177ec2e61f4ac
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: C++ Family of Languages [was :ada and robots]
Date: 1997/06/26
Message-ID: <dewar.867308907@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 252657889
References: <JSA.97Jun19183318@alexandria.organon.com>
 <Pine.SGI.3.95.970619163029.5827A-100000@shellx.best.com>
 <dewar.867078005@merv> <33B1E1E2.31DE@dynamite.com.au>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Date: 1997-06-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Alan said

<<Anyone who's tried porting large amounts of code in C++ will know what's
meant.
>>

OK, so you meant to say family of dialects, rather than family of languages,
and to be fair, this is probably a transitional phenomenon that will 
gradually disappear when the C++ standard appears.
dp