From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3283a610ea0294f5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: What's Pure for Dist Sytems?
Date: 1997/06/20
Message-ID: <dewar.866854357@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 251465764
References: <5oa5ol$8vv$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
 <x2pvtianx1.fsf@inf.fu-berlin.de>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Andre says

<<However, even under this proposal, Ada.Strings.Bounded and
Ada.Strings.Unbounded are still non-remote.  I find this an
intolerable restriction, too, and I wonder if anyone sets out to
remedy this...>>


Finding something intolerable does not constitute a solution. I assume you
understand *why* this rule is there. What is your proposal to "remedy this".