From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bbbeae4ed07e9626
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Address to function pointer conversion
Date: 1997/06/20
Message-ID: <dewar.866852168@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 251467024
References: <5nrq5h$13cm@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <dewar.866305487@merv>
 <5o39sm$2fl6@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <dewar.866484497@merv>
 <33A5B0B3.7EA663D3@link.com> <dewar.866563840@merv>
 <33A6EF3D.505EEF54@link.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


And Sam, do NOT assume that C represents a pointer to a function as an
address, there is no such requirement in C.