From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,91c5b958fecf5eff X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: GNAT exception traceback Date: 1997/06/20 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 251455800 References: <199706131810.OAA07239@seahunt.ctron.com> <01bc7a82$c57186a0$2a208b82@wd> <33A6A725.3BD0@no.such.com> <33A6FAC5.9BB@no.such.com> <33A85168.4E1A@no.such.com> <33A87008.6F0C@bix.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Tom Moran said <> It is often not hard to do for one particular architecture, and the PC architecture is a particularly easy one to deal with. The difficulty is in implementing this in anything like a machine dependent fashion. The reason that there are so many GNAT ports today is that the entire phiolosophy of GCC has been to be extremely antagonistic to the introduction of highly machine dependent stuff into the system!