From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c78177ec2e61f4ac
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: ada and robots
Date: 1997/06/20
Message-ID: <dewar.866846539@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 251445680
References: <97060510114032@psavax.pwfl.com>
 <339C1ECF.431B@mlb.cca.rockwell.com> <339E143A.349D@dynamite.com.au>
 <gwinn-1006971856380001@dh5055139.res.ray.com> <dewar.866044235@merv>
 <gwinn-1706972224170001@dh5055155.res.ray.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Joe says

<<Really, I don't plan to get into such a down in the bits argument; I
haven't the time or energy or reason to fight with you.  Even if I won,
what would I have to show for it?  Fails cost-benefit analysis: All cost,
no benefit.>>

Can't say I am surprised at the refusal to meet the requirement for 
producing actual C code. After all this is the only way that you can
be proved wrong, and why should you risk it? :-)