From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd6dd,c78177ec2e61f4ac X-Google-Attributes: gidfd6dd,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,c78177ec2e61f4ac X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: ada and robots Date: 1997/06/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 248885649 References: <338CDA96.53EA@halcyon.com> <338F5D7D.6C03@tiac.net> <338F9D05.5EB3@bix.com> <5mqpj3$bc5$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <33930245.12A1@sprintmail.com> <5mv984$7kn@news.emi.com> <01bc7132$11100fa0$4c0b6dce@my-pc.neosoft.com> <33A56EBE.748C@lmco.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.robotics.misc,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <<> > > I would also comment that DoD's recent recinding of the Ada Mandate will > > > likely cause the Ada compiler and tools market to shrink to perhaps as > > > little as one tenth of its prior size, and that significant added > > > investment in Ada compilers and tools is therefore unlikely, at least > > > until the size of the remaining market becomes clear.>> I think this was Joe Gwinn's comment (it is consistent with his general sentiments), but I am not sure. In any case, we certainly do not see the change in the DoD view of Ada having any significant negative impact on our business, and on the contrary, we regard it as overall positive, since it helps clear the air. Our customers, both in the US and abroad are Ada enthusiasts for whom the mandate is in any case irrelevant. Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies