From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7960854d8fb4735e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: More 100% Ada 95 validations from ACT Date: 1997/06/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 248484236 References: <1997Jun13.161951.1@eisner> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Larry asks <> The validation is only for the PPC. There is an old port for the 68K, but it is not being maintained at this stage, since no one seems to have any real interest in it. The supported product, from both Tenon and ACT, is a PPC only product. Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies I guess more properly I should say PowerMac rather than PPC in the above (PPC is the chip, but the machine on which this port runs is the Power Mac).