From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,19b6efa2ecebaed0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Ada95 Pretty-Printers Date: 1997/06/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 248368907 References: <339C58A6.4D5A@sprintmail.com> <339D677D.2FAC886C@link.com> <33A02793.431C@sprintmail.com> <33A157AA.1F2F3650@link.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Sam says <> Only by default, in that the RM has very little to say about indentation, except at the most gross level. For instance on the subject of indenting then's that do not fit on one line, the RM is (reasonably) silent. For recommendations on style at this level, you have to look elsewhere than the RM. Personally my only real criterion for style is absolute consistency. I mistrust people who have strong feelings about one style over another, because it is such people who end up being recalcitrant when they move into a new environment with differnt established styles. The original GNAT style was established by consensus among the original GNAT group, with simple majority voting where there were disagreements. Every now and then, someone new starts working with the sources, and rants and raves because they personally don't like this or that style choice. We never pay any attention, and in our experience, anyone can get used to anything. I really think that consistency is the ONLY critical style requirement.