From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/06/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 247442453 References: <5mmvgj$61k@squire.cen.brad.ac.uk> <19970602.562B58.2B32@ai110.du.pipex.com> <5n1261$qj6@polo.demon.co.uk> <19970602.433020.144E5@ai078.du.pipex.com> <33983ABE.26B2@sni.de> <19970606.49CA70.12B91@ae124.du.pipex.com> <5nfnq1$6ta@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net> <339BA835.6A5C@sprintmail.com> <339CA0E7.14AF@sprintmail.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> Cross-posting does not increase bandwidth The total bandwidth taken up by comp newsgroups is absolutely negligible in terms of the wwwait compared with the binaries in alt.sex. If the digesting process cannot kill threads, it is defective. The ability of people to follow off-topic threads obviously appeals to a lot of people. As long as a thread is easily killable, I see no measurable disadvantage. Finally, the most useless of messages are like yours and this one here, that waste time discussing whether some other thread should exist or not. You can never kill a thread by telling people to stop contributing. Instead you just dd irrelevant junk to the thread :-)