From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/05/29 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 244773377 References: <5m57nu$7si@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5m859v$2qr@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net> <5mb3ra$1qj@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5md5q8$slo@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net> <5mgann$qbi$4@news.cc.ucf.edu> <5mii4t$69s@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: i<<>Isn't "technology" a relatively new word?>> relatively recent -- the first OED quote is 1614, and there are several other 17th century and 18th centuray quotes. This in the scale of English words probably qualifies as relatively new, but I have a feeling the author of the above question might have a more recent timeframe in mind :-)