From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/05/24 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 243586590 References: <01bc66fa$ee7910e0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <5m57nu$7si@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Kaz said <> Well, like Humpty Dumpty in Alice in Wonderland, you can declare that "words mean what I want them to mean" [not a literal quote :-)] but in normal English usage, technology is a very broad word. For example, the definitions in the OED are: 1. A discourse or treatise on an art or arts; the scientific study of the practical or industrial arts. 2. The terminology of a particular art or subject; technical nomenclature. So if in your lexicon it applies to hardware and not software, you are using the word in a peculiar idiosyncratic way, which others will not understand unless you warn them of this idiosyncrasy! Certainly you cannot have a pet peeve that others do not share this non-standard viewpoint!