From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f8b2fd444c211b5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Help: pragma inline
Date: 1997/05/20
Message-ID: <dewar.864184325@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 242732413
References: <3381bff2.quantum@quantum.pc.my>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<<OA gives a warning message on line 193: Pragma Inline may not occur
after the subprogram body, ignoring pragma inline on this subp.

Could anyone explain more about inline and whether the warning could
affect the intention of pragma Inline?

Your help is most valuable.


Thank you in advance.>>


Most probaby OA is ignoring the pragma given the message, and certainly
it is more normal to give the pragma after the spec anyway. But any
compiler is allowed to ignore inline anyway. GNAT allows inline in
this position, but it is very unusual usage (note that a representation
pragma certainly could NOT occur here -- after the freeze point).