From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0452dbe16ac0df4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: ObjectAda vs Gnat -- bugs
Date: 1997/05/15
Message-ID: <dewar.863746153@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 242717347
References: <5lf6ka$nbg@service.polymtl.ca>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


granger said

<<If gnat is correct ( probably gnat!!!), the internal package RGB_Value does
 not have any influence, how can I have the enumeration values Gray* and
 Grey* of the same type or subtype with the same internal value ?>>

Well I am not sure where you get the "probably gnat" from, but in this case
it seems obvious that GNAT is right, unless I am missing something. You
have an object renaming declaration and you are trying to rename a functoin.
The GNAT message seems correct (I suppose that it would be nice if it would
remind you that an enumeration literal is a function and not an object, since
it is true that this can be a bit of a surprise!