From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1df6bc3799debed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Not intended for use in medical, Date: 1997/05/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241480228 References: <3.0.32.19970423164855.00746db8@mail.4dcomm.com> <5kmek2$9re@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: One more comment <> Very often people who make this criticism simply count the number of interpretation requests. That's truly stupid, since a large number of them are presentation comments (people think there should be a comma here, or that something should be in a different type font etc).