From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b307bd75c8071241 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: newbie Q: storage management Date: 1997/05/10 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 240537617 References: <5k5hif$7r5@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jon said <> If no customers would even think of asking for something, it does not *begin* to belong in the standard. However, DSA is of course not in this category. Lots of Ada users know very well they need this kind of capability, and there have been several more or less successful attempts to provide this capability. The DSA did not appear out of the blue in Ada 95, it appeared because there was indeed a consensus recognition that this was an important problem that needed a solution. The issue was not whether the facility was needed, the answer to that for a significant number of applications is of course yes, and you can be sure customers know it. The issue is whether enough was known to usefully standardize it. Sure there may be customers who don't know all the details of what they want or need, and part of the job of a vendor is to help them figure out these details, but in my experience, Jon's scenario of clueless customers who don't have any idea of what is going on is certainly not the norm!