From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2925b133078d1557 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Flexible Strings (was Equality operator...) Date: 1997/05/07 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 240170666 References: <9704301422.AA07755@most> <5kocg6$hln@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <53F35740C6EF076C.14BEEF8227919F71.39E2B6FED1F30314@library-proxy.airnews.net> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Kevin Cline said <> Apparently you have not kept up with the times, you are comparing an obsolete version of Ada to C++, which is rather inappropriate, considering that Ada 95 is standardized several years before C++! So I suggest you bring yourself up to date before making statements about what "few Ada compilation systems" may or may not provide. Our convention in this newsgroup is that Ada undecorated means the current version of Ada, i.e. Ada 95 (note that the Ada 95 standard is now over two years old, there are over 50 validated compilers, and Ada 95 is available on virtually every common architecture, so we are not talking science fiction here). One of the important features in Ada 95 is the storage pool mechanism, which provides considerably more flexibility than the corresponding C++ mechanisms. All versions of GNAT, and most if not all, other Ada 95 technologies fully support this storage pool feature.