From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c3a7c1845ec5caf9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Equality operator overloading in ADA 83
Date: 1997/05/03
Message-ID: <dewar.862714036@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 239219761
References: <mheaney-ya023680002904972106200001@news.ni.net>
 <E9JMAM.L92.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <dewar.862576384@merv>
 <E9KAMv.Krw@world.std.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Duff says

<<If you're using the "always-share" model, then there so much extra
overhead anyway, that I wouldn't cry about a little more.>>

I think that is an exaggeration. How much overhead is involved depends on
the architecture. For example, on the old Rational machine, the overhead
from always share was quite low ...