From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,73036d0217be91e2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Inheritance versus Generics Date: 1997/05/03 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 239106835 References: <33601924.774@flash.net> <5jql3p$p9p@top.mitre.org> <01bc5272$cbd7d400$28f982c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <5k5suu$bhj@top.mitre.org> <01bc5745$202225c0$d5fd82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Nick said <> Actually the light brushing here seems to be more on your side. Yes, the idea of making packages first class is superficially appealing, and it certainly was not "lighly brushed aside", but was on the contrary carefully examined over a long period of time by a lot of people. In the light of that discussion, the great majority of the DR's (really everyone except Tony Luckham, who subsequently dropped out) decided that the added complexity was not worth the functoinality, which we felt could be adfequately obtained in other ways without introducing as much complexity. So you may or may not agree with this, but should probably examine the issue in more detail. it is a deep one!