From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,121fc5bd008aba4e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Passing PUT to a generic Date: 1997/05/02 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 239052653 References: <5kb746$6n2@Urvile.MSUS.EDU> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Brian asks <> YOu should always send source, but in this case, you have run into a problem so common that it should be in some FAQ somewhere. Everyone thinks of Put has having one parameter, and therefore being suitable for use as a generic formal subprogram with one parameer -- but in fact Put has several parameters, so it does not match -- You wll have to make a wrappr. \