From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,baa6871d466e5af9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: AQ&S Guidance on pragma Elaborate_Body
Date: 1997/04/24
Message-ID: <dewar.861930741@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 237229005
References: <528878564wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk> <dewar.861642821@merv>
 <E940xu.62B@world.std.com> <335F5449.6644@elca-matrix.ch>
 <E95wv5.EMr@world.std.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<<>I really think this elaboration stuff should fixed in an AI (of course
>only the part that ensures Program_Error is not raised on a subprogram
>call or generic instantiation). Do you think that would be possible, or
>will we have to wait until Ada 0X ? :-)>>

This would introduce serious incompatibilities in legacy code. There is
nothing to stop indvidual compilers from impleemenjting some static
scheme, but it cannot be mandated.