From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c8bbb1419c8e81a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Waiver question
Date: 1997/04/24
Message-ID: <dewar.861870384@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 237058194
References: <33585385.C8D@lmtas.lmco.com>
 <EACHUS.97Apr21141820@spectre.mitre.org> <335D0E73.4E92@lmtas.lmco.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<<As for Ada 95, there is no such compiler for the TI DSP target
in question, only an Ada 83 compiler.>>

True, right now, but if an Ada 95 compiler was needed, it would not be
that hard for one to appear. It is often the case using the GNAT
technology that an entire new Ada 95 port can be built at a price
comparable to what was charged for many "off the shelf" Ada 83
technologies.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies