From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c8bbb1419c8e81a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Waiver question
Date: 1997/04/23
Message-ID: <dewar.861814978@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 237089070
References: <33585385.C8D@lmtas.lmco.com>
 <EACHUS.97Apr21141820@spectre.mitre.org> 	<dewar.861656765@merv>
 <EACHUS.97Apr22141821@spectre.mitre.org>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Eachus said

<<   I knew about the SGI case, but thought it was special.  You are
saying that there is a GNAT to C++ interface that can be re-targeted
by the user?  Neat.>>

Absolutely! All compiler dependent stuff (including the layout of the
vtables etc) is defined in a procedural manner by a runtime routine
which can be reprogrammed.