From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,691bbbf0ab0cc67e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: [Q] Returning Strings From A Function Date: 1997/04/07 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 231346114 References: <33474626.4BA3@us.net> <19970407112901.HAA07881@ladder01.news.aol.com> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John Herro said <. Of course it is quite reasonable in a given environment to have the convention that aoll functions returning strings always return a low bound of 1, and then to count on this (the string packages in Annex A work this way).