From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c95a73ec6ed5f174 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Floating point problem Date: 1997/03/28 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 229144627 References: <199703271518_MC2-1360-15BE@compuserve.com> <5hft5r$9sv@hetre.wanadoo.fr> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: <> First, of course there are machines with this kind of profile available. Second I never said you should buy a newer machine, I said you should buy a newer machine if you want to run GNAT! Not surprisingly, the community that wants to run cheap old machines is not exactly the community to look to to generate resources for enhancements that will benefit such machines :-) Everyone agrees that it would be nice if GNAT ran on machine X, for all possible X, if they don't have to find the resources to make it happen :-) I never said it was actively desirable for GNAT not to run on old SX machines, or on embedded chips without fpt -- just that (a) it does not support such machines, just as it does not support the transputer and (b) we have no plans to do such a port -- just as we have no plans to support the transputer. If some volunteer wants to make GNAT work on coprocessor-less machines using operating systems that do not support this transparently, that would be nice. It would also be nice if a volunteer made a version of GNAT for the transputer. Neither are high demand items (I did a poll in my class last semester, no one had anything vaguely as out of date as a 486SX, indeed many had amazing machines), so that's why they don't exist yet, but that does not mean it would not be a good idea for them to exist!