From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0f035b936128b6c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,c0f035b936128b6c X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: Ada95 to ANSI_C converter Date: 1997/03/28 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 229202723 References: <5hbrah$ctt$1@gail.ripco.com> <01bc3a3d$7734db20$63f482c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <5heoel$bc0$1@gail.ripco.com> <5hfagl$frr@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c Date: 1997-03-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Craig says <> I doubt that is a helpful suggestion -- PDL is just another programming language, and there are difficulties in convering from Ada to PDL, and difficulties in convering from PDL to C. Yes, I know PDL is designed to ease these difficulties, but in practice, if you are starting with well written Ada code, I do not think using PDL as an intermediate step will help, and if you are starting with poorly written Ada code, then you will probably do better to reengineer in any case.