From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,113cbde0422b98e8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Why no constraint error?
Date: 1997/03/24
Message-ID: <dewar.859259990@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 228161659
References: <E7EHzv.MHq@world.std.com> <E7G5q1.J8q.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
 <33369ACC.41C6@magellan.bgm.link.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Sam Mize said

<<No.  I tested the array case with a straight uninitialized
variable, and it indexed to it.  (I used Normalize_Scalars
to get a predictable value, but I don't *think* this would
impact the presence/absence of this range check.)>>

"it indexed to it"

but certainly did not assign to it!!!!