From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fdf7ac0fadfb9b3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: HELP! Date: 1997/03/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 226438464 References: Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jon says <> The trouble if you do this is that you will not know what is standard Ada, and what are routines special to GNAT that are not part of the language. Better to stick to the standard documentation sources (RM and the GNAT manual. The one exception is that the GNAT hierarchy contains routines that are definitely available for use (but are not standard Ada). Advising people to look in Ada_Include_Path is not helpful on many GNAT systems, because the library will not be in the path (on many GNAT installations, following standard Unix practice, there is a default directory for the standard library that is NOT explicitly in the path.