From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,257bb1c458aacca7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada IDE for Win 95
Date: 1997/03/16
Message-ID: <dewar.858526145@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 225992092
References: <332A3A2B.57B2@mad.scientist.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


<<<BR>What I don't understand is why I should use command-line based tools like
GNAT when there surely must be a windows 95 IDE for Ada 95 (even if it
is only a front end for GNAT) around.>>

You should try using Ada mode EMACS ...

If you are looking for a Borland style thing (I would not grace simple
systems like this with the gradiose title of IDE), then there are a couple
around, one from Brighton, you can track down these and other tools
from www.ada.home.com.

Personally I find Borland style interfaces compltely useless for serious
development, but tastes differ. They may be OK for trival student
type work, but for serious development, they get in the way.