From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d053083f91c271b2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: floating point problem Date: 1997/03/15 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 225840899 References: <5f0faa$6ok@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net> <331ace4d.1427558395@news.mwci.net> <1997Mar5.083938.1@eisner> <1997Mar6.080211.1@eisner> <5fvqkr$7n7@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <1997Mar10.074953.1@eisner> <1997Mar12.095335.1@eisner> <1997Mar14.073448.1@eisner> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Larry said <> Of course you cannot look in the RM to find out what an Ada compiler should do when it is run in a configuration which it does not support. You might as well try loading the Ada compiler into a washing machine and adding detergent, and then say -- well I knew it wouldn't run perfectly, but I thought from the RM that some exception should be raised :-) When you run GNAT on a machine with no floating-point and no floating-point emulation, it is not quite as bad as putting it in a washing machine, but from a formal point of view it is the same. Who knows what happens? I never tried it, so I don't know, but you certainly cannot look in the RM to see what happens. Mike must know what happens, since he complains about his from time to time!