From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc65fe38e6751a89
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Aeonix Ada 95
Date: 1997/03/10
Message-ID: <dewar.858002209@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 224401259
References: <857938743.26136@dejanews.com> <dewar.857944378@merv>
 <33237061.6A5D@bix.com> <33239BEA.21C9@aonix.com>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Dave Wood asks

<<GNAT is not validated for *any* real-time targets, is it?>>

Well I am not quite sure I understand this question. Certainly for example,
SGI considers that IRIX is usable for a wide range of real time applications,
and for example JEOL is successfully using GNAT for real time applications
in the medical instrumentation field, and we have many other customers
doing hard real time applications using validated versions of GNAT.

Perhaps what dave meant to say here was embedded or perhaps cross targets,
in which case the answer is no, not yet. We expect to complete our first
cross-validation in the next couple of weeks, and we will let you know
when that is successfully completed!

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies