From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e70c13232dc4a26 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Subject: Re: logarithms on ada Date: 1997/03/07 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 223895557 References: <5fcqrs$ius@panther.Gsu.EDU> <331c6ce7.856445@news.demon.co.uk> <33205b8c.1147493@news.demon.co.uk> Organization: New York University Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Johnm McCabe says <<2) Most people (despite what you would like to believe) still use the 1983 definition of the Ada language.>> Actually I doubt that is true. It is most certainly true of large commercial projects using Ada, since such projects adapt only slowly to new technologies. But the availability of GNAT means that tens of thousands of students around the world are programming in Ada 95 as we converse :-) I would be willing to bet that the questioner in this case *was* using Ada 95!