From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d053083f91c271b2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: floating point problem
Date: 1997/03/06
Message-ID: <dewar.857693327@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 223689886
References: <5f0faa$6ok@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net>
 <331ace4d.1427558395@news.mwci.net> <dewar.857535729@merv>
 <5fm8dj$9c@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl>
Organization: New York University
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Geert says

<<Why do you think the OS/2 version of GNAT doesn't work on a x86 system
without co-processor?
>>

Indeed,, that's probably right, though I never tried it (I must say the
thought of running OS/2 on 386SX is pretty gruesome, I like OS/2, but
I consider a top of the line Pentium to be minimal acceptable computing
power to support it :-)